I just saw a few days ago that there was an update to the
Slackware-current Changelog. I was beginning to wonder
when the next update was going to be. To be fair though it really hasn't been
all that long since 11.0 was released. I'm not sure if it's official but it looks like Slackware is
finally switching to the 2.6.x.x series of kernels. I really like
Slackware but the one thing that was taking way to long was switching to
2.6. I'm no expert an I'm sure Patrick Volkerding has his reasons but it would
have been nice to have an easy option in the setup routine to choose between
2.4 and 2.6. You could sort of do it but then it required manually finding the
modules and headers package and using
installpkg to install those
too. It's not really a big deal for a seasoned Slackware user to do that but
the convenience would have been nice. In either case, from a look at the
changelog it looks like 2.6 is required which will be a welcome change.
The upgrade process explained in
CHANGED_AND_HINTS.TXT looks a bit onerous though. Perhaps
it will get better but I don't think it will matter so much for me as I'm
thinking of a fresh install anyway. My current install has been upgraded
since 9.0 (or maybe 9.1) if I recall correctly and is beginning to develop some cruft. It'll
be somewhat painful until I get things just right again but it'll be nice to
start with a clean slate. Slackware 9.0 was released in March of 2003 so this
install has been around for about 4 years or so without any major problems.
Not a bad run I think. Wow, 4 years, has it been that long? Normally I keep
my system updated to current but am thinking of holding off until it's farther along
in development. Maybe I'll even wait till it's released before taking plunge.
I get the impression that things are changing a lot for this next release.
On a somewhat related note I've decided to finally give Ubuntu a shot on a spare
system. I had to install the kubuntu-desktop package as I can't stand Gnome.
It looks pretty nice so far though. I need to get more familiar with it's
package management system though. So far I've figure out it has apt-get, aptitude,
and synaptic as ways to manage your packages. Each one has it's advantages
and disadvantages but I'm not sure just what those are yet.
I did get
Beryl
working on it briefly and it looked really nice but never got it to work
again. I'm not sure what changed as it was working before I went to bed and
the next day it wouldn't run. Unless the gremlins stopped by and messed with
things nothing was changed by me overnight. Beryl looks like it is still very
experimental though so I can't complain about instability.
It may not seem like it having said all of the above, but prepping for the
70-296 exam continues. I've just about finished getting more familiar with the
Windows Certificate Authority stuff which is something we actually use at work.
As always, prepping seems to take longer than anticipated. I tend to over
prepare for these exams and can't seem to break away from that. I'd rather study to know the material than study
to just pass the test. At $125 a try, pass or fail, I hate to take chances.
OK, I think I'm done rambling now.